Current progress is shown below from the most recent meeting of the
DICOM Base Standard (WG-06) and associated official telephone
conferences.
WG-06 meets five times a year to do technical review and harmonization
of the output from the 31 DICOM Working Groups.
These DICOM supplements add new "chapters" to the standard and the grouped
DICOM change proposals, called CPacks or voting packages contain minor tweaks or bug
fixes.
Supplement 201 Retire Dose from MPPS was voted final text. This
supplement retires the Radiation Dose Module from the Modality
Performed Procedure Step SOP Class. Retirement does not require any
implementations to stop using them. It does mean DICOM will no longer
maintain them.
This Supplement defines patterns for transformation of measurement and annotation information for use-cases related to reporting of quantitative imaging results.
The Annotation and Image Markup (AIM) project defines a UML model and an XML schema for describing the observations that humans or machines make about specific semantic types of information in images: anatomic entities, imaging observations and their characteristics, quantitative imaging features of targets of interest, and other information about targets in images.
AIM information is captured using user-defined lexicons and/or well-defined medical lexicons such as RadLex, UMLS, SNOMED CT®, CPT, ICD-9/10, etc.
Image annotations in AIM have been used for cancer lesion measurements and ROIs for capturing quantitative imaging features, and it is desirable to harmonize this effort with similar capabilities that exist in DICOM, to allow AIM and DICOM systems to interoperate for these use cases.
DICOM PS3.16 defines various templates for different applications. The TID 1500 Measurement Report template describes a generic pattern that is similar to AIM and has been used for the same use cases.
This supplement defines a mapping between compatible components of the AIM model and the DICOM SR TID 1500 Measurement Report applicable to quantitative and categorical description of regions of interest in images.
A discussion produced an updated and improved scope and field section.
The focus of the meeting was the bi-directional mapping between AIM and the SR template.
The supplement was voted to go out for letter ballot voting.
This Supplement extends the CT Image IOD and Enhanced CT Image IOD to support new types of images generated by Multi-energy (ME) CT scanners.
It describes various ME imaging techniques. While different vendors apply different techniques to achieve ME Images, there is large commonality in the generated diagnostic images. It adapts existing attributes of the CT / Enhanced CT IOD to fit ME techniques.
To detect the different X-Ray spectra, Multi-energy (ME) CT imaging uses combinations of different Source(s) and Detector(s) technologies such as current switching X-Ray tubes, spectral detectors, multi-layer detectors, multi-source and detector pairs.
Multi-energy CT data can be reconstructed and processed in different ways to serve a variety of purposes.
The multi energy macros have been factored out and put into a separate module (Multi-Energy CT Image).
Public Comments and the resulting revisions were reviewed.
The supplement editor recommended to keep image type value4 along with real world value mapping as value4 is heavily used in the field today. Working group 6 argued that real world value mapping shall be mandatory.
The further discussion concludes that rescale types may be better in part 17.
A walk through of the specific ME attributes took place.
The review will continue toward the goal of Letter Ballot.
This Supplement specifies IODs for Radio Therapy Radiation and Radiation Sets in the areas of C-Arm techniques. A Radiation Set defines a Treatment Fraction as a collection of instances of RT Radiation IODs. Each RT Radiation IOD represent a different treatment modality. This supplement is uses the concepts and model found in supplement 147.
The new IODs supports all current treatment modalities and to be extensible for future modalities and new equipment.
Separate IODs defines specific treatment modalities, these include Tomotherapeutic treatments, C-Arm beams and Robotic beams.
Public Comments and the resulting revisions were reviewed.
The scope and field section is updated and the explanation of specific RT terminology is made clearer.
The concept of “Manufacturer’s device class” got positive feedback from working group 6. It was recommended to add this as a general concept to the equipment module. It will be of general use beyond RT scenarios.
The review will continue toward the goal of Letter Ballot.
This supplement introduces IODs for Radio Therapy non-C-Arm treatment devices. This supplement is uses the concepts and model found in supplement 147 and definitions in supplement 175.
The focus in the meeting was on the definitions of code values. The detailed discussion brought several improvements, which were incorporated right away.
The supplement was voted to go out for public comment.
This supplement re-documents (rewrites) Web Services in DICOM section PS3.18.
The goals of this rewrite are:
The most important aspect of the re-documentation is to avoid changes in semantics. Errors, ambiguities, and underspecified aspects of the existing standard are out of scope and handled with change proposals to the current standard.
There was no presentation or discussion during the meeting. The time slots were used for "Thumbnails for Web" and other topics.
The review will continue toward the goal of Letter Ballot.
This supplement affects Part 18 of the DICOM standard. It is based on the re-documentation in Supplement 183, especially section 11.4.
This supplement defines a Thumbnail resource on the WADO-RS study, series, and instance resources in the DICOM RESTful web services standard. This supplement provides a simple way to retrieve a representative image of a study, series, or instance.
This transaction returns an image for the parent resource that reflects the content of the resource. The primary use cases for this service are: 1) to provide Thumbnails to image viewers or 2) to provide Thumbnails to EMR/EHRs, e.g., as referenced from FHIR Imaging Study resources, in a simple and straightforward manner. An example Thumbnail resource would be: https://<DICOMweb endpoint>/studies/1.2.423432.1343223/thumbnail
The main part of the review was to discuss and walk through the closed and open issues section.
The supplement was voted to go out for public comment.
Two new Secure Connection profiles are added to make DICOM consistent with the latest RFCs and best practices for TLS security. These are:
Both the old Basic TLS Secure Transport Connection Profile and the old AES TLS Secure Transport Connection Profile are retired. The methods for breaking the old profiles are well known. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) strongly recommends the updates introduced with this supplement.
The scope and field section was presented and improvements were incorporated during the discussion.
It was suggested to improve the general motivation and context around use cases for this supplement.
The supplement was voted to go out for public comment.
This Supplement describes a new DICOM Service for the transport of real-time video and associated medical data.
The Real-Time Video Service supports interoperable devices inside the Operating Room and beyond, enabling a better management of imaging information.
Professional video (e.g., TV studios) equipment providers and users have defined a new standardized approach for conveying video and associated information (audio, ancillary data, metadata…) enabling the deployment of equipment in a distributed way (vs. peer-to-peer).
This supplement defines an IP-based new DICOM Service for the transport of real-time video including quality compatible with the communication inside the operating room (OR).
The SMPTE ST 2110 suite, elaborated on the Technical Recommendation TR03 originated by the VSF (Video Services Forum) is the technical platform.
This supplement defines mechanisms to specify medical metadata to follow in the stream of the video signal.
The format of recording is out of the scope of the supplement, as well as the way of replaying the recorded videos. The supplement covers a method for feeding the recorder with the synchronized videos and associated metadata.
Among going through the new open issues a longer debate on the distinction between medical archives and video recording storage in general occurred.
To illustrate typical use of this supplement typical surgeon use cases were presented.
The meeting members discussed further specific important aspects:
The specific art of linking the video stream into the DICOM object proved to be an interesting topic, especially the question of transporting the payload within or outside of the DICOM object. There was no concluding decision.
Around attribute details on patient, study, series and instance level necessary for real time video, it was suggested to work this out in more detail.
The review of the draft supplement will continue work up to public comment.
This supplement adds a new DICOM IOD to encapsulate Stereolithography (STL) 3D model file formats.
This allows 3D manufacturing models to be exchanged between various types of equipment using DICOM messages. This adds the ability to store, query and retrieve 3D models as DICOM objects.
3D model files are a type of document that contains geometric instructions to create physical objects by a 3D printer or milling machine.
To exchange these 3D models in an efficient manner in an imaging environment, especially as part of patient care planning and the patient’s imaging record, it is useful to be able to “wrap” these model documents in a DICOM container.
This supplement only supports the binary encoding of STL for DICOM encapsulation.
This was a first reading of the Supplement.
With the help of the overview presentation slides the main use cases were illustrated. They were to create, review, update and print 3D manufacturing models in the form of encapsulated STL format.
Different options when using encapsulated MIME for this supplement were illustrated and discussed.
In a further discussion, working group 6 advised against supporting preview and real model distinctions. This would make the supplement unnecessary complex.
The review of the draft supplement will continue to work up to public comment.